Skip to content
PROGRAMME BRIEFING · CALLANDERCallander

A new route.Know the details.

Hypothetical example: a saved copy of an official program page can help explain earlier planning, but current action should use the current official instructions for the applicable arrangement. Gold Card describes processing fees, vetting and a gift to the U.S. government, with successful applicants proceeding through EB-1 or EB-2 subject to category eligibility, admissibility and visa availability. It is a branded framework rather than a conventional statutory visa category, not an EB-5 investment, and its official terms must be re-verified before any money moves. A first review should identify the individual applicant, the version of the official instructions that governs the next step, and the separate eligibility, admissibility and availability questions. It should produce a dated payment-stage checklist rather than a sales summary. The U.S. government receives the Gold Card payment from the applicant rather than a private intermediary. It is never a conventional visa, and it does not itself settle the underlying immigration decision.

Talk about GOLD CARD
Official individual contributionUS$1 million
DHS processing feeUS$15,000
Review date7 September 2026
01

Identify which version supports the planned step

Hypothetical example: an applicant has a months-old fee worksheet while a adviser provides a newer official instruction. Record the dates and the actual source of each. Do not treat an undated screenshot or promotional summary as the controlling current process. Check the live official framework and payment directions again immediately before transferring money. Hypothetical example: a marine-insurance brokerage owner receives a private invoice that calls itself a Gold Card reservation payment. The responsible decision is to stop and compare the recipient, amount and stage against the current official instructions. An intermediary’s invoice cannot convert a private transfer into the government-required payment.

02

Keep the payment types distinct

The official description includes a nonrefundable processing fee and a gift after successful vetting. It is not an EB-5 investment or a promise of return. Published charges exist and should be checked directly; payment does not produce automatic residence or citizenship. Before paying, confirm who must pay, the government recipient, the payment stage, and what follow-up evidence is required. Keep a receipt together with the instruction that authorized it. A payment confirmation cannot establish all immigration requirements or an included relative’s independent eligibility.

03

Review the individual and family facts

Identify the applicant, current arrangement and any included family members’ own steps and costs. A change in a web page does not automatically decide an existing case; use official correspondence and applicable instructions. Avoid guessing either retroactive effects or guaranteed timing from a general update. Where family participation is contemplated, list each intended person and verify the actual relationship and age facts at the time the program requires them. Keep a separate cost and document line for each rather than spreading a household estimate across everyone. A later family change may require a new assessment, not a retroactive alteration of a prior application.

04

Use the current individual, corporate and family amounts

The official FAQ checked September 7, 2026 states a nonrefundable US$15,000 DHS processing fee per person. After successful vetting, the principal gift is US$1 million for an individual or US$2 million per corporate-sponsored employee. Each eligible joining spouse or unmarried child under 21 adds US$15,000 and a US$1 million gift, including in corporate cases. Corporate terms describe 1% annual maintenance and a 5% transfer fee including a new DHS background check. Reuse of a prior corporate principal gift under the official process is not automatic approval of a replacement employee. Additional State Department and medical costs may apply; verify current instructions for the actual proposal. Treat published corporate terms as distinct from an individual application. The first review should identify the sponsor, employee, funding responsibility and any later replacement proposal without assuming a company payment erases the employee’s individual screening. Preserve the official notice and all changed facts for the arrangement actually used.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

GOLD CARD · CALLANDER

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.