No. Purchased technology belongs to whoever pays for it and a competitor can license the same thing tomorrow. What counts is knowledge of the organization's own product, process or procedure, and the spending that helps is the cost of documenting it.
You cannot purchase the element you have to prove
Hypothetical example: Tomasz owns an East Ferris hydraulic-hose manufacturer and has been advised that licensing an expensive testing platform will strengthen his employee's transfer petition. It will not. Any competitor can license the same platform, so operating it is industry skill, and an officer reading the petition will say precisely that.
The spending that improves the case is unglamorous: internal time to write down a process the company has been carrying in people's heads, effort to reconstruct training records, letters from customers who required a particular engineer by name, and counsel to test the knowledge description before it is filed. Government fees are separate again and are published on Form G-1055, which may include the petition fee and premium processing where a decision is needed quickly. Where the company has adapted a purchased platform in ways that are genuinely its own, that adaptation can be evidence — but it is the adaptation, documented, not the invoice.