Skip to content
FOR BUSINESS LEADERS · POWASSANPowassan

Built in Canada.Ready for more.

Hypothetical example: Delphine is general manager of a meat-processing company in Powassan owned by a family group, and that group has just acquired a further-processing plant in the United States. The plan is for her to run the American plant while local leadership is built. She has fourteen years with the Canadian company and reports to the family shareholders. Whether her petition is framed on executive capacity or managerial capacity looks like a drafting choice, and it is not: the two tests examine different things, and each is answered by an organizational chart on a different side of the border.

Talk about L-1A
PurposeExecutive or managerial transfer
Company linkQualifying related businesses
New officeA distinct evidence requirement

IN THIS GUIDE · Whether a meat-processing general manager transfers as an executive or as a manager

Start with the L-1A eligibility and application overview

01

The two capacities are not interchangeable, and the chart decides which one applies

Managerial capacity means primarily managing the organization or a department, function or subdivision of it, supervising professional or supervisory staff or managing an essential function, with authority over personnel decisions or over the function's direction. Executive capacity means primarily directing the management of the organization, setting goals and policies, exercising wide latitude in discretionary decision-making and receiving only general supervision. Delphine's Powassan chart shows her directing a production superintendent, a quality manager and a maintenance lead, and answering to shareholders rather than to an operating executive. That reads as executive on the Canadian side. Whether it reads the same way in the United States depends on what the American chart will look like.

02

Where these petitions usually come apart: a thin chart at the receiving end

The failure is rarely the year abroad, which is normally easy to prove, and rarely the corporate relationship once a share purchase closes. It is the American plant. A further-processing facility acquired with thirty employees but no supervisory layer leaves Delphine directing line workers herself, which is neither executive nor managerial however senior her title. Petitions of this kind commonly assert a structure that exists only in a slide deck. The evidence has to show the subordinate layer as it stands, name the positions still to be filled, and give the hiring schedule and budget behind them, or the description will be read as an owner-operator running a plant.

03

The other common failure: a Canadian chart that dissolves after she leaves

Both entities must continue doing business throughout, and the Canadian company must remain a real employer rather than a shell holding the American plant. Groups sometimes move their strongest manager south and quietly wind down the operation she leaves behind, which ends the qualifying relationship on which the transfer depends. Before filing, the group should know who will run the Powassan plant, and that person should appear on a chart with their own reporting lines. A second, subtler problem arises where Delphine keeps signing for the Canadian company from the United States: the petition then describes a role split across two entities, which is harder to defend at extension.

PUT THE DETAILS TO WORK

Guides for your next decision.

L-1A · POWASSAN

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.