No. Each sponsored employee has an individual record, vetting, and applicable immigrant-process requirements.
Name each applicant separately
A corporate arrangement can coordinate money and paperwork; it cannot merge two people into one applicant. Each named employee is assessed alone, and three separate questions decide each of them. First, individual eligibility in the underlying employment-based immigrant classification, EB-1 or EB-2 as applicable, which turns on that person's own record and qualifications and, where the classification requires it, a qualifying job offer or a national-interest basis.
Second, individual admissibility, which turns on that person's immigration, criminal, medical and misrepresentation history and cannot be cured by an employer's endorsement. Third, whether a visa number is available in that classification for that person's country of chargeability. The published Gold Card framework adds a payment step to that process: the applicant makes a nonrefundable contribution to the U.S.
government together with a separate processing fee. That money moves from the applicant to the government: it is not an equity purchase, it earns no return, and nothing is given to the applicant by the government in exchange for it. It is not an EB-5 investment either, because EB-5 capital is placed at risk in a commercial enterprise and is expected to create jobs, and it is not a visa category in its own right.
It creates no new eligibility test, waives none of the three questions above, and does not convert a company's approval into a government one. Because the route is recent and its published terms have moved, check the official program page and FAQ directly before each step rather than relying on an internal briefing note or on how the terms read earlier. Individual eligibility advice should come from a U.S.-licensed immigration lawyer.